Research films DART and ARROW trials > ARROW – clinical vs lab monitoring

ARROW clinical trial – Clinical vs lab monitoring in HIV+ children

Only around a half of the African children who need HIV treatment are getting it. Without anti-retroviral therapy, most will die within five years. The ARROW trial looked at the same question as DART, but in children, following more than a thousand participants over five years. The results once again showed no benefit at all to using laboratory monitoring to check for side effects, and only a small extra benefit to monitoring treatment with CD4 tests to detect early treatment failure. The results strongly suggest that prioritising medicines for all the children who need them will save many more lives than investing in the expensive lab tests used for monitoring by many programs.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your comments provide extremely useful feedback about what we are doing well and how we could make films better. Please note that we check all comments against our publication standards before approving them.

Watch this film on one of our video channels:     

Download this film to watch and share offline: Visit our downloads page

Want to stay updated about our future projects? Register for our newsletter

If you are using our films for education or training through an organisation which has a budget, we request that you make a donation. Visit our Donate page to see our suggested contribution amounts:

Sign up for our free newsletter

By signing up to our mailing list, you agree to allow Picturing Health to email you regularly with film projects, news and appeals relating to our work. We will not share your information and you can opt out any time.

Thank you for subscribing

Sign up for our free newsletter

By signing up to our mailing list, you agree to allow Picturing Health to email you regularly with film projects, news and appeals relating to our work. We will not share your information and you can opt out any time.

Thank you for subscribing